The approach would be to copy all Production Master Data to the TESTING Systems (TEST or
PROTOTYPING).
Usually Quality systems are used to stage transports to production as well as provide a platform for
Testing and Training. This would not be considered best practice as transports for various
requirements may remain untested for some time before being transported to Production. It would
be better to have separate QA and Test systems. In fact multiple Test systems may be necessary
for multiple projects.
Assuming TEST is separated from QA, the first step would be to create a system copy of Production
to QA. It would then be possible to take a Configuration Copy of QA to provide the basis for
creating the TEST Clients/Systems. This new System would be a fraction of Production’s size. An
Intedex Request / Model will be set up to extract all master data from Production and write it to
TEST. This Model can be re- used to refresh the system with up to date Production data.
Advantages of extracting Production data to TEST Client/Systems with Intedex
|
Advantage
|
Description
|
Return
|
|
QA is a preserved replica of
Production
|
QA becomes a true staging area for Production
transports. Pre- production testing is a true
simulation
|
Improved Integrity of pre-
production testing
|
|
Storage requirements
|
TEST systems would be a fraction of Production in
size (without years of transaction data) requiring
less data storage
|
Significant reduction in
storage/server costs and
maintenance.
|
|
Performance
|
TEST systems would be a fraction of Production in
size, greatly improving performance.
|
Less Functional Testing hours.
Improved Testing environment
|
|
Setup time and Flexibility
|
Using a Configuration copy and Master-data
extracted using Intedex, set up time would be
significantly reduced . Refreshes of master data
with Intedex can be made online.
|
Less Basis hours.
More flexibility
|
|
Multiple TEST/Prototyping
Systems/Clients
|
Multiple projects/prototypes can be launched
running on different TEST clients/systems
|
Reduced cost by running projects
in parallel. Improved Business
Service Levels
|
|
Performance
|
Less transports to fix issue. I.e. Accurate testing
occurs in DEV not only in TEST
|
Less Basis Consulting Hours
|